Onderwerp: NEWS Sokker- big changes are coming!

What is the best way to get the developers to consider this?

I really don't know.

Specially the bottom league should not be that difficult to implement. Even all small countries just need 1 top league and below that the large bottom league without divisions for all new managers that start playing Sokker.

So many great ideas in the past, all got ignored. Not saying mine is a great idea, but it could solve the playing against bots only problem.

We could increase plus price to 100£ a year so they can afford a coder maybe

Good idea ...

They already have coders, what they need is a programmer :-)

So maybe they could code in steroids, there's is no usada like establishment in sokker, so all juniors could be on steroids and better

And once a season there's a test, with let's say 15% chance to get caught
If caught insta retirement

And when you buy player you can do your checks and know with80% certainty whether player is on steroids or not

I'm pretty sure Dylan Benson is on drugs of some kind.

---

can we add @ in forum and get notification and with one click we can go to that comment where someone mention us. ( ofc it should have allow/disallow option) or ( ban someone if spam on forum) :D

it will be easier to find and not lose if someone ask you something..

When will big changes come?

It's logical that no talented junior wants to join your youth school; they're too afraid of being traded as meat.
Or perhaps meat traders are being punished with the youth school ? That would be a big and welcome change!

Wait, let me find Carvajal

[url=https://imgbb.com/][/url]

Wait, you are sure he didn't rather do this face to you after you were whinning because of the transfer market and the youth school ?
We're not very interested in your meat trader issues, there's no need to waste your time and ours by publicly sharing your frustrations in this forum.

You must be a real hoop real life. Pointing out everybodys fault. Or you only have the guts to do it online.

The voting was fluctating.... the last number i saw before it was closed was 15 yes, 14 No..... but nobody would vote yes to forum ban if they just want to see result or havent been much active...so it was a biased voting which clearly showed People Are feed up with you...

Also there was several People writing in it, all expressing big emotions against your behaviour
(gewijzigd)

I'm not pointing the finger at anyone's faults, but at the contradictions and inconsistencies of some here.
Of course, people voted NO because they're not active and/or because they just wanted to see the results. It's a funny way to read a poll, and a very convenient one for you.
I don't care if 4 or 5 emotional people among hundred felt compelled to show their feelings by commenting on an outrageous poll that should never have been allowed.

You don't care but you feel it as outrageous?
(gewijzigd)