Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Onderwerp: »General Questions

2023-08-10 19:24:39
adaca naar Dtox9
As i said, you wouldnt understand. I didnt say make drops smaller. I said make drops smaller + probability higher. This will give you what you are asking for (a somewhat linear function). But never mind.

Im off from forum for some time again, you kill my mood for debating, because you have to have right, even when you have no clue what you are talking about and what the other one is saying. Maybe borkos have patience to try teach you some math again, mine is done.

2023-08-10 19:47:26
I get that this is a game, but the ratio between, being a game and try to simulate real life, is also so badly distributed within the game.

Going by that logic, you can't train a player from average pace - average tech - average striker to 3x divine in real life - but you can here

In general it's not possible to improve RL player's pace from 1 to 17, but in sokker it's easily doable - so if you can't lose playmaker in real life, then you also should start with much higher pace that would be difficult and limited in training

Players like Mbappe or Messi were top of the world by the age of 21, it's not possible here etc.

It's just a simple game, there's no point going into such details imo
2023-08-10 20:04:16
tsolias naar adaca
LMAO
2023-08-10 20:17:17
Oh!! so... Does that mean that the personal factor associated with improvements in a player's skills, "his talent", would also be linked to his drops?

I think that these values shouldn't be random, as Dtox puts it about player minutes, that complicate this calculation a bit at the server level it would only have a strong impact on Wednesdays when both attributes are updated.
2023-08-10 20:17:57
Dtox9 naar adaca
I didnt say make drops smaller. I said make drops smaller

So I'm the fool here... laugh what you want, but you don't even understand what you've said yourself.

And even if you make probability higher, it still is too random! Then random pops should also occur from time to time, within the same ''math''

@ Borkos:

Going by that logic,

It is exactly what I said... THAT logic is Sokker logic, not my logic, and it isn't logical at all. The distribution between real life and game is bad, that is what I'm talking about.

So I mean that some points could be simulated like real life and other needs to stay strictly game based. And the distribution of those points in Sokker is very bad imo, that's all...
2023-08-10 20:53:06
adaca naar Dtox9
I tried explain it to you with basic math. But what you are asking for is small drops with 100% probability (true linear). Right now we have big drops with 2-10% probability (quite extreme random). We both agree its too random. But i disagree with you that it should be true linear, because this would make the game even more predictable and less simulated then it already is. We even should have had 0-100 skills instead of 0-18 and some 70-100% progress from training to make it even more realistic but still with pops that made it funny. And with bigger scale the random would seem less, but still harder to calculate then current linear system.
Players real life dont all grow in same periods and detoriate in same periods, an this is Football manager game and not Lego castle building. But i think I used way too much time arguing this with someone who cant even figure out the math of a gt versus an advanced training stays the same cause he gets confused about age.
(gewijzigd)
2023-08-10 21:16:44
adaca naar Dtox9
And yes you are the fool, when you cant see that this statement "Make drops smaller" is world in different to "Make drops smaller PLUS PROBABILITY HIGHER"..... first statement tells you want them to detoriate slower, second statement tells you want it less random, they have nothing to do with each other....... but i dont know how much more kindergarden like i have to explain it.
2023-08-10 21:23:54
Dtox9 naar adaca
You are insulting me for a math retard on the forum, but in different words.
You are the kind of troll who likes belittling others by being a smartass on forum.
I think it would be for the better if this discussion is closed.
2023-08-10 21:38:53
adaca naar Dtox9
I might be insanely tired of you arguing everywhere without much logic in your statements yes, but your level of curtesy when arguing is no better then mine. You are the kind of troll that is a moderator.
2023-08-10 22:13:10
mangol naar adaca
Where is trga with his comments when he is desperately needed!
2023-08-10 22:58:11
Trga is busy! He is promoting Cold-Iced Coffee Capsules at the moment..
2023-08-11 08:26:14
Tad naar Dtox9
agree, not all skills are equal so they should have diff probability
2023-08-11 09:09:59
trga naar Tad
I've heard a rumour
2023-08-11 09:23:52
2posto naar Tad
Solution is evenly drop of all skills for less points?
What abot stamina dropping quicker to minimum by 30+ players and affecting performance? It could be quick and quite effective solution.
2023-08-11 09:25:28
Tad naar 2posto
I think also each player should have different aspect - there are some players who could start to age at diff age (diet, etc)
2023-08-11 10:10:30
borkos007 naar Tad
They do now because of the random

Some are useless at 34, some can play at 40