Onderwerp: »General Questions

They do now because of the random

Some are useless at 34, some can play at 40

It is exactly what I said... THAT logic is Sokker logic, not my logic, and it isn't logical at all. The distribution between real life and game is bad, that is what I'm talking about.

No, I was referring to the "playmaker should not go down so fast/at all" logic

if we go down that road then improving some skills should also be limited (you can't improve pace a lot by training, it's based on genes) etc.

if you say "A" you have to say "B", you can't just choose the "real life" aspects that you like and ignore those that you don't

---

Sure. I'm not against that at all.
I was just pointing out the thing that comes to mind. I'm not thinking an entire new game on the spot...

that's not what i meant
i meant:
two players could have different probabilities of losing points
two different skills could also have different chance of losing a point

I was completely ignored :(

Why changing everything in the game, drops are as they are, why not keeping them as they are.

Well, if we see players with 28-29 years old, dropping abilities, I think that recently occurred a change in this module. Honestly I don't remember this in the past... but, I can be wrong.

I am not saying it's fair or nice to have skill drops that early ages as 28, 29 y.o It definitely shouldn't happen. However after their 30's, if they do not get full training their skills may drop, however if a coach has old players and sacrifices advanced training slots for them i think the skill drop should be drastically slower. Obviously when they reach certain 36 or 38 or 40 in age then the fall could be accelerated, but in now a days some guys play very high level at their 36's still.

How many teams are promoted from the league. Rules needs updating.

1st place gets promoted automatically, 2nd place gets to play promotion game against higher leagues 7-9th seed team.

I see it like this: the randomness in the downgrades in ability acts as a counterweight to long-term involvement in the game. Through the enabling of a gamble on players who are cheap to procure but expensive to have on the payroll. If you need a spike in performance, you allot some of your current attention to finding a player who'll be good enough. And if he wears out, you can just dismiss him and buy another cheap veteran. You can keep the teamwork high by employing them earlier too.

If the downgrades were made more predictable, it'd raise the prices of some of the veterans - and the selling side would have an information advantage.

I understand nothing of your texts. I guess they're written or translated by AI, it translates 90% of this games vocabulary wrong. So it all doesn't make too much sense.

Maybe use AI, read the text thoroughly and change it to the correct vocabulary. That would make it easier to read.

Also, try asking AI to use a more casual style of writing instead of this upper class society style of writing :'-)
(gewijzigd)

Maybe he speaks like that

Funny thing is he writes exactly the same way in Polish :p. We are having a hard time understanding him aswell.

---