Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Onderwerp: cancellation of player sales of 29-12-2024
Marek0090 naar
jimdrago78
I don't know, you bought 32yo player 2 seasons ago for 3.5M euro.... I don't know his real price.... 1.3M doesn't seem to be bad
jimdrago78 naar
Marek0090
Its too bad for a 16-17-16 attacker, believe me, if you see the rest players, top Def Mid, national team player of Hellas left for 1 mil , believe me, you would be mad ...
borkos007 naar
jimdrago78
Kaltofen went for a normal price, he was 34yo.
This season 16-16-16 went for 997k, Kaltofen went for 1.3m.
Another 16-17-16 went for 1.5m season ago.
This season 16-16-16 went for 997k, Kaltofen went for 1.3m.
Another 16-17-16 went for 1.5m season ago.
jimdrago78 naar
borkos007
He went 700.000-1.200.000eu lower his price for his form and skills
I have seen attackers like him, starting season reach 3 mil and more
It's big robbery, if server didn't have problem he would go for more
I have seen attackers like him, starting season reach 3 mil and more
It's big robbery, if server didn't have problem he would go for more
marvik naar
jimdrago78
bro just write to admin and put ur players on Transfer list again and u have more money probably
just do it. Happy new year!
just do it. Happy new year!
I've seen 28 yo striker 3x16 for 3M....
Market for older players went down a lot....prices for fresh pulls doubled amost though...
Market for older players went down a lot....prices for fresh pulls doubled amost though...
Parmigianino naar
kryminator
kryminator a Sílvio
it's not my solution, I dont care about it at all
I just gave you the only possible way to resolve the problem to your advantage
I am not sure I understand the logic behind this procedure.
There was an issue with the website, issue that affected all the trasfers. I guess there should be an automatic procedure to manage something like that but probably it did not work.
At that point, either you restore an old backup or you leave it as it is.
"Fixing" some trasfers (on demand only) is not a fair procedure to the community. The result is that somebody got an advantage in any case. In my opinion this is something should not happen.
I hope you're working on it to avoid the re-occurrence of the issue.
Please let me know if I wrote something wrong.
(gewijzigd)
it's not my solution, I dont care about it at all
I just gave you the only possible way to resolve the problem to your advantage
I am not sure I understand the logic behind this procedure.
There was an issue with the website, issue that affected all the trasfers. I guess there should be an automatic procedure to manage something like that but probably it did not work.
At that point, either you restore an old backup or you leave it as it is.
"Fixing" some trasfers (on demand only) is not a fair procedure to the community. The result is that somebody got an advantage in any case. In my opinion this is something should not happen.
I hope you're working on it to avoid the re-occurrence of the issue.
Please let me know if I wrote something wrong.
(gewijzigd)
kryminator naar
Parmigianino
there is no automatic procedure to manage such problems, maybe it will be someday, but it's certainly not a priority because those problems are very rare
so far it is unknown why it happened and it probably might happen again because probably no safeties were done, no conclusions, nothing generally to prevent it (or I just think so, I might be mistaken here)
there was slowness of website but imo it didnt cause any harm, not for transfers at least
the only harm caused due to that slowness was that the matches were played not in time and someone might had wanted to use a player in a match and then sell him but due to matches being played later than they should player was sold and didnt participate in a match
I think that there should not be any compensation to those who sold players during that day and I will certainly not contribute to reversing transfers as I think it would be unfair, very unfair.
However, that is only my opinion. No one has to agree with that and there is green light from owners to revert those transfers, but each of them considered individually. Even then, it is matter of admins whether they will agree to user request as they might think that price was ok etc.
I am just passing information here, it's not my decision.
so far it is unknown why it happened and it probably might happen again because probably no safeties were done, no conclusions, nothing generally to prevent it (or I just think so, I might be mistaken here)
there was slowness of website but imo it didnt cause any harm, not for transfers at least
the only harm caused due to that slowness was that the matches were played not in time and someone might had wanted to use a player in a match and then sell him but due to matches being played later than they should player was sold and didnt participate in a match
I think that there should not be any compensation to those who sold players during that day and I will certainly not contribute to reversing transfers as I think it would be unfair, very unfair.
However, that is only my opinion. No one has to agree with that and there is green light from owners to revert those transfers, but each of them considered individually. Even then, it is matter of admins whether they will agree to user request as they might think that price was ok etc.
I am just passing information here, it's not my decision.
Dtox9 naar
kryminator
Sure but this is not constructive or informative at all.
Transfers were influenced due to the slow servers preventing people with weaker devices, not being able to get online or deal with transfers properly, so having stronger devices gave advantage and is imo a pay to win feature, unwillingly, but still.
secondly, I don't see why this has no priority in your eyes. Simply because you had no pending transfers and thus no issues with the slow server? This has been an issue for a long time, even way before the new devs arrived. They were informed numerous times and still this is no priority? I recon the game itself has no priority...that I can agree with.
Obviously, it's waaay to late for reversing transfers or compensating, but I still like to see compensation for all transfers gone wrong, in the form of an automatic system which delays or freezes transfer pending time for the duration of the server issue. It's only normal imo! Make sure the same problem doesn't occur again! The solution is reached out. Do something with this information in stead of minimalising the problem.
Transfers were influenced due to the slow servers preventing people with weaker devices, not being able to get online or deal with transfers properly, so having stronger devices gave advantage and is imo a pay to win feature, unwillingly, but still.
secondly, I don't see why this has no priority in your eyes. Simply because you had no pending transfers and thus no issues with the slow server? This has been an issue for a long time, even way before the new devs arrived. They were informed numerous times and still this is no priority? I recon the game itself has no priority...that I can agree with.
Obviously, it's waaay to late for reversing transfers or compensating, but I still like to see compensation for all transfers gone wrong, in the form of an automatic system which delays or freezes transfer pending time for the duration of the server issue. It's only normal imo! Make sure the same problem doesn't occur again! The solution is reached out. Do something with this information in stead of minimalising the problem.
The server slowdown made very difficult or impossible for players to bid. Finally prices may have been lower than during normal working of server . That' s obvious for every one but not to kryminator.
Sílvio naar
kryminator
There were no problems with the transfers? Did you check this? A topic was created with the title "cancellation of player sales 29-12-2024", with at least 12~13 other users joining. In addition, there were numerous concrete reports from users who stated that they were unable to bid in the auction, because the page crashed, was slow or simply the bid button did not appear.
Yet another problem was created: with the player's return to the club, Sokker is considering the player as a rookie and charging the maximum tax (50%), when they should disregard this return. Are you working on this?
Yet another problem was created: with the player's return to the club, Sokker is considering the player as a rookie and charging the maximum tax (50%), when they should disregard this return. Are you working on this?
it works..
ps: Do returning players count as new purchases?
if I sell them immediately do I incur a 50% tax?
ps: Do returning players count as new purchases?
if I sell them immediately do I incur a 50% tax?