Onderwerp: 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa

Yesterday's Inter win was also undeserved.

Why? Because Barca made 1254352 passes in a row? :)

oh c´mon french deserved to win that year, Italy shoul´ve been out in the round of 16 match but that gayass ref screwed australians..

I see it different ;-)

Well, if we want to talk about refs - Barca should've been out after games vs Chelsea last season, though the ref missed 2 penalties and a red card as far as I remember.

and inter should´ve been out yesterday and Ireland should´ve been in WC:) and as far as wikip just told me, french should´ve got a 1 more penalty against Italy in 2006:P

There was no penalty and there was a clear hand yesterday.

1) the ball touched Yaya's hand = true
2) Yaya moved his hand before touching the ball = true
3) Barca was helped by this hand = true

why should there be no freekick then? :)

In 2006 in my opinion Germany deserved the win most. In the semis they were much better than Italy just unlucky.

No way. The match was quite even, and it was the best match of the whole WC , a pleasure to watch. Then Italy had the edge on the extra time and won rightfuly.
In the end, teh best team won the world cup in 2006.
Btw, Italy didn't play as defensive as usual in that WC, just balanced. Clearly, it played less defensive than Brasil plays now (people here saying that Brasil is on the "bueatiful football" side REALLY don't have a clue), their just victims of their reputation :P

1)the ball touched Yaya's hand = true but his hand was against his body so this does not mean anything
2)Yaya moved his hand before touching the ball = true, but his hand was moving against his stomach before the inter guy even hit the ball = nothing illegal here
3)Barca was helped by this hand = true but yaya´s hand would´ve not been there then barca would´ve been helped by his stomach, cause that´s where the ball was directly heading.(there was no way at all that the ball could´ve gone the way where inter´s def hit it)


1)yaya´s hand was against his body
2)ball was hitten against him from 1-2 meter dictance = there is no way you can make a intentional handball in just a tiniy part of a second
3)ball was going straight to yaya´s stomach and the "handball" was probably all thanks to reflexes

= unplanned closed handball = no handball:)

@Zten you mean:P

3)Barca was helped by this hand = true but yaya´s hand would´ve not been there then barca would´ve been helped by his stomach, cause that´s where the ball was directly heading.(there was no way at all that the ball could´ve gone the way where inter´s def hit it)

not really. the ball would bounce back to Samuel, but because of the hand it went straight down, and that's why he was able to make the key pass, and that's why the goal shouldn't have been allowed. :)

maybe you are right, but it doesn´t eliminate point 1 and 2:P you cannot make the decision based on which way the ball bounces if there was no official handball.

which is still - unplanned closed handball = no handball:)

but ok I guess neither of us won´t change our view on that so I guess I should stop here:P
(gewijzigd)

I agree :P

last year they got to final with help from then refs, this year they fell out beacause of the refs... all fair:)