Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Onderwerp: »[info] Dev Diary 77: Tax reform (final)

2020-04-20 13:43:55
Imo it is not needed to have more talented topjoniors. If one trains the talented juniors himself then they need not be magical. I have been training badly distributed lowskillers in my club for years. As long as they are trainedf long term and talented they can still be topplayers. Granted though, low ages are needed.

That is exactly what I like, cause it provides challenges.
(gewijzigd)
2020-04-20 15:20:55
I agree
2020-04-20 17:34:52
Its not about the need. Its about that someone gets 1 magical per 2 seasons and someone 1 per 25 seasons.
2020-04-20 18:20:39
I think that top-players are too much: a 3x18 att simply should not exist.
I think that trading (buy-sell) without training should become a losing game-

Both things because this makes the game harder and full of choices.
2020-04-20 18:29:34
...and what if we would simply introduce two more skill level above superdivine (19, 20), which will reached only a few player even with today's conditions?

I mean today we can training both a very good talented and a top-top talented player till superdivine, but after this change, only the top-top talented players will have a chance to reach such high levels, because they get the 18. level earlier and they don't will run out of developing time before they beginning dropping skillpoints because of late in life = high age.

I think that is not so complicated from the solution/development site, and with this we don't need to do a too big change. Am I right? What do you think?

/Maybe this is not a new idea? In that case, sorry, I try to be up-to-date, but todays there are a lot of threads to read.../
2020-04-20 18:31:53
introducing another level makes sense
2020-04-20 18:44:41
it is also posibility, one that should not be hard to implement and i cannot see many side effects
2020-04-20 18:48:00
I think this is exactly the same as slowing training. But maybe it gives a better UX.
2020-04-20 18:51:05
as long as another couple of levels aren't added to form to make those constantly low form players even worse performing!?!
2020-04-20 20:12:46
BlueZero is right, some teams are extremly lucky with junior school, with same investments as others. Some kind of random should be kept for sure, but current system is only random. Maybe add more parameters that will cost more money: coaches, youth strutctures etc.
(gewijzigd)
2020-04-20 20:18:28
sviktorov naar Maserati

introducing another level makes sense


+1 , let us introduce some new levels , like 3 more levels before u get to superdivine, only the REAL toptalents will get to this level. This would be brilliant if u had like 20 levels of skills.
2020-04-20 21:19:59
superdivine 18

iperdivine 19

megadivine 20

pussydivine 21
2020-04-20 21:23:47
Stop trying to promote the Womens Championship ...
2020-04-20 21:25:59
Bericht verwijderd

2020-04-20 21:30:19
+1
2020-04-20 21:35:41
xD

0. tragic
1. hopeless
2. unsatisfactory
3. poor
4. weak
5. average
6. adequate
7. good
8. solid
9. very good
10. excellent
11. formidable
12. outstanding
13. incredible
14. brilliant
15. magical
16. unearthly
17.terrestrial
18.supernatural
19.mystic
20.psychic
21. divine



(gewijzigd)