Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Onderwerp: [info] Training issue - solutions

2025-03-11 20:41:34
I don't see even one 16-17yo player in your team and that's what we're talking about.
2025-03-11 21:30:59
Of course they've got older in the meantime!

But no matter what I write here, only you and your ilk are the very best, everyone else is stupid and has no idea, right?

Let's leave it at that, because I won't get any real or at least conditional approval here anyway, after all you and your elite football experts are the absolute football cracks and everyone else is no good, so they're just so-called extras here!

I hereby take my leave of this international know-it-all forum and have absolutely no more fun taking part in it, after all I am not accountable to anyone here and have to declare my opinion here at a low level!

Admire each other in future and leave me out of it, it's better that way, because I have absolutely no need for that

Arrivederci!!!
2025-03-11 22:09:03
koka naar bluered
1) it was about 16/17 yo trainees. So borkos clearly made a point here.

2) you are not playing with 16/17 yo players.

3) Even last season, when you finished 1st in 3rd division, you played only with one 16/17 yo player against me. And my average rating was somthing around 35-40, while you had 55-60.

4) you may play competitive in lower league (3rd level) with few 16/17 yo trainees, but won't manage it in 2nd Bundesliga. And that is what this discussion is about here. No need to oppone anybody.
2025-03-11 22:14:56
bluered naar koka
And I didn't say that I only played with 16- and 17-year-old players.
I wrote about trainees, regardless of their age!

Read my text properly before you take someone's side!!!
(gewijzigd)
2025-03-11 22:23:05
It doesn't matter what you wrote about, the whole discussion was about extra training for 16-17yo players and possibility to play for results at higher level while using 16-17yo players. Not 20, not 21 or 22yo players and not one 16yo player.

So you were simply completely off-topic in this discussion.

PS. please chill out, you're extremely agitated every time you appear on the forum (of a stupid game). Not healthy.
2025-03-11 22:23:45
koka naar bluered
I read your text. And yes, you did not write about 16/17yo trainees. But you gave your statement (one can do a lot with strategic adaptions, which most of us here certainly support) in the context of an ongoing discussion about 16/17yo trainees.

And that context made your comment either not fitting or missleading and wrong.
(gewijzigd)
2025-03-11 22:32:15
bluered naar koka
That was a general comment from me, regardless of the age of the trainees!
Ultimately, I would of course also do this with talented 16 and 17-year-olds and I guarantee that they would be successful, as long as they can fulfil the minimum requirements for the respective field positions of my tactical game specifications!!!
And this statement is by no means misleading!!!l!!!
(gewijzigd)
2025-03-12 16:58:49
adaca naar bluered
But No matter if you train 96% with all trainees (which i did too besides week with last two matches) and won the danish title either way, you can only do this vs. 55-65 opponents. And No matter that you can that it will be much easier for farm clubs, and teams who compete at 70 rating matches cant.

The proposal is not good, its much better if you simply got higher training % in friendly so that all could train effecticely and less advantage to teams who farm.
At real life football only some very few in the whole world play senior team football that young.
2025-03-12 17:14:44
-_-
You could always solve farm issue in the same time. But you tried to kill the discussion even before you gave a proper argument against it :)
2025-03-12 17:38:22
You received arguments. It would make the game even easier for farming and at the same time harder for people who compete.

Good luck solving "farm issue", please give your idea about that.
2025-03-12 18:22:26
Solving the farm issue IS the issue in this case.
That's what adaca and Borkos are trying to say.
Your plan is not bad, but it requires that issue to be solved first.
My opinion, punish playing without results much more. Give penalties for losing with 5+ goals difference on purpose by playing a weaker team or by not using funds to diminish the distance between your adversary and your own team.
You should be aware that playing on a certain level requires a certain strength from your team. If you don't try to meet those requirements, fans should revolt and decide to stay away from your stadium. But as a new(er) team. If they know that you don't have the means to meet those requirements, they should stay loyal and the penalty should not occur.
2025-03-12 18:22:47
Nah i dont feel like i want to discuse any ideas with you ;)

But there is one stat in game that can be used to remove farms from game. The lowest leagues and new playes probably would need some other balance changes to avoid bad exeptions from happening but nothing imposible to do.