Onderwerp: $200m in transfers

It reflects success in making money, but not winning games. Depends what your goals are. I change mine depending on which ones I'm currently achieving. :)

it does not reflect success in making money entirely because ive obviously made a lot to have my current squad. its more about how you manage your profit. i can go into detail if you want

and my goal is being #1, not sure about yours =P

I agree with you. The profit\loss is not all telling. There are a lot of factors. Your horse is sexy.

haha thanks

ive thought about this before, ill try to summarize:

it only reflects money spent/recieved from player transfers, so even if i make a profit from training a player, if i spend that money on a new player i end up pretty much right back at where my profit/loss was before. but if i were to take the profit and spend heavily in non player items (wages, stadium, coach gambling/market, etc) then i would stay in the positive. but ive been very frugal with my spending on nonplayer expenses (my opinion is people pay waay too much for coaches) for the past 4 years here and its compounded from there
(gewijzigd)

Transfers income: 100 961 912 $ average 753 447 $ (134 of sales)
Transfers expenses: 85 940 536 $ average 1 227 722 $ (70 of purchases)
profit/loss: 15 021 376 $ average -474 275 $

My goal is to spend and buy as much as humanly possible, ultimately have the best players in the US by far, and win despite my tactical ineptitude. With good economic planning, I'll have double unearthly players (3x for strikers) on my team for every non-trainee position within 4 seasons. If my trainees are good, then I should have about a much better set of players than everyone else in the US.

not better than mine will be =D

pretty nice price on sesa for his form
(gewijzigd)

You are kidding, right? How do you expect to get double unearthly non-trainees unless you buy them?

I thought you launched that plan two or three seasons ago, and you've went backwards in that timespan.

Nope. I mistimed the whole thing. I am now buying them at 22-23 but can afford better than the last set. I'm not selling these, either. The plan was ok, but I bought the wrong non-trainees and they got old while my trainees got too young. Dropping down to A was good - I can buy better 22 year olds with the profits from the sale of my older mids, and buy mid better trainees that will be more affordable because I don't have to buy them quite as good. I hope to have a younger team and survive in A, while that was suicidal in the ML. Hopefully, the 8 seasons I have with the non-trainees before their value drops down to $0 will give me time to get a better cycle of trainees set up.

And I also hope to avoid putting b-teams in against 7th place teams, hope to avoid 2 seasons of dreadful form by my strikers, and hope to avoid losing my best mid for 5 games to injury in an NT game all at the same time.

i had a 21yo and three 22yos at the heart of my mid/defense last season and won, now im just droppin mills on trainees

and what do you mean by double unearthly nontrainees? doubleunaerthly and bad other skills isnt too desirable
(gewijzigd)

Strikers will be 3x unearthly. Defenders will all be divine def with unearthly pace and outstanding tech with excellent or better passing and PM.

So your team will be better than our National Team? Keep dreaming.

Talk to me in 5 seasons. Heck, I just sold a 2x unearthly/1x magical striker because he was too old. Having ridiculous amounts of money kind of makes buying good NT caliber players pretty easy. :) Just for fun, I'll post the striker I just bought. Will be getting pace and tech training this year. He's +4 tech, +1 pace.


Mickael Croci, age: 22

club: Nanook of the North, country: France
value: 745 000 $, wage: 10 225 $
solid form, weak tactical discipline
bookings: injury: (slight injury)
good stamina poor keeper
outstanding pace average defender
brilliant technique average playmaker
good passing unearthly striker

He'll have unearthly tech (needs about 7 weeks tech total to get there) by the end of this season with incredible+ pace. And he'll be ... 22. By the time I need him in 3 seasons, he'll have plenty of time to get the last two pops in pace. Hopefully, the form doesn't stay at hopeless that whole time.
Here's my keeper. Better than Kast was at that age.

Christoffer Brasas, age: 22

club: Nanook of the North
Matches
Players
Transfers
History
, country: Deutschland
value: 3 071 500 $, wage: 36 700 $
magical form, adequate tactical discipline
bookings:
good stamina divine keeper
outstanding pace weak defender
weak technique average playmaker
excellent passing weak striker
(gewijzigd)
(gewijzigd)

unearthly pace by the end of the season? haha impossible

Typo - I meant unearthly tech with incredible pace by the end of the season.